
Interpersonal conflict occurs so often, that most of us have acquired a manner of resolving arguments. However, the trouble is that we often employ the same approach to resolving any conflict that arises, and this should not be the case as, more often than not, disagreements are different in nature and thus should be addressed independently.
An example of a conflict that I have once been involved in was during my early university days in 2008. One of my closest junior college friends had tickets for the annual National Day parade rehearsal and she had invited our common group of friends along. However, due to limited tickets available, I was not invited. As a result, I was upset when I found out about it, especially since I was closest to her in that group of friends and I voiced out my unhappiness with the situation and we got into an argument. Back then, I dealt with it in a somewhat childish manner as I just simply stopped talking to the group of them. However, I should have approached the conflict maturely and dealt with it appropriately. The main problem was that she had assumed I was too busy to attend the rehearsal and as such, when on to invite others. While that was the main problem, several other causes made the situation worse such as our distanced friendship as I was the only one posted to NUS with everyone else having gone to NIE. Was the assumption made by my friend the main problem?